Though many characters arcs in the cinematic adaptation of The Lord of the Rings hold my affection, one particular story line moved me unexpectedly. The tale of a daughter contemplating a life married to a Ranger-Turned-King, who would forsake her immortality for many years of happiness. Arwen, the Elf-Maid, wanted to wed Aragorn, but she faced not only pressure from her father against it, but the inevitable truth that he and his descendants would die off, and she would be “alone” until she chose to cease to exist (which Elves can do).
Though a less controversial expansion of a female character than the invention of Taurel in Peter Jackson’s prequel of The Hobbit, Arwen met with mild resistance upon the trilogy’s initial release, from book puritans who did not see the need to “waste time” on her side of the story. I beg to differ, not because I am opposed to masculine-driven narratives (of which Tolkien, with his history in the first world war, and the camaraderie of “brothers in arms” felt comfortable), but because the story needs Arwen in a prominent role for us to understand why Aragorn cannot be with Eowyn, the more obviously “cinematic” heroine—the woman who cross-dresses and sneaks into the army, who chafes at the men who control her, and who deals the final death blow to the King of the Nazgul, the ‘supposedly’ immortal Ringwraiths that have tormented Frodo from the beginning.

Eowyn is an easy character to love and admire, and her obvious affection for Aragorn means that we would naturally have rooted for them to come together, two lost souls in the great expanse of Middle Earth, who find and heal each other’s fears. At least, that’s what I thought when reading the books, because there, Tolkien does not devote much time to Arwen. She appears a few times, makes a semi-memorable impression, and then fades away, lost in his male-driven narrative (… until Eowyn shows up, that is).
But Arwen faces an enormous sacrifice, much like Frodo—where he loses his spiritual life in carrying the great and evil Ring thousands of miles across the world to throw it into the fire, and almost loses his soul, Arwen faces an eternity of division from her lost loved ones, separation from her beloved father, and the harsh reality that as an immortal, she will outlive Aragorn, no matter how much she loves him. Thus, the interactions between she and her father, Elrond, become painful. He does not want to see her “die.” She does not want to leave the man she loves. Arwen decides his love for even a brief time is worth her sacrifice, and her father challenges Aragorn to “become the king you were born to be.”
In the books, Aragorn is not running away from his fate and is not full of fear of what he might become… but I think Peter Jackson and his writing team did a splendid job with fleshing out the first trilogy and making Tolkien’s incredible characters even more “real.” And among them is Arwen—no longer an evasive Elf dressed in white, but a living, breathing, fierce female character, who now challenges the Nazgul and raises the river to wash them away, who gives Frodo some of her precious life force so he might live long enough to reach her father’s healing touch, who wants to obey her father but cannot ignore her heart, and who almost dies because of the great evil spreading across Middle Earth, because she gave her protection, the Evenstar, to the man she loved.

I’m not a sappy romantic, though I love a delightful love story in which two characters come together as equals, but I always tear up when Aragorn sees her, after they have defeated the great evil. She is his bride. His “reward.” And he is hers. Their union reminds me of what a marriage “should” be—two strong, capable people who improve each other, for without him and the promise of his love, she might not have the strength to ignore her father’s advice (however practical), and if not for her, Aragorn might have run away from his destiny forever. He “became” so he could save her. Since Tolkien was a devout Catholic, it’s also easy to see in their union symbolism for the Church and Christ—a sacrificial act, the giving up of one’s Self and one’s Life paralleling the sacrifice of Christ, to ensure the spiritual redemption of mortals. Arwen becomes one of the many “Christ-figures” in the story which includes Frodo (iconic as the “suffering” Christ), Sam (the ever-present Holy Spirit and Servant Christ), Aragorn (the “hidden” King), and Gandalf (the “resurrected” Christ).
The first time I saw The Fellowship of the Ring, I had never read Tolkien. I wept over Gandalf’s fate and that Frodo had to leave his friends. All except the loyal Sam, who also brought me to tears (“I’m going alone, Sam.” “Sure you are, and I’m comin’ with you!”). I could not stand to wait a year to find out what happened, so I bought and read the books. Imagine my surprise to meet Tom Bombadill and… find so little of the fabulous Arwen on my screen. It’s fine if you dislike her expanded role, but I love it. It will forever remain close to my heart.
I wrote this to participate in the Tolkien Blog Party. Click here for more entries.
I love what they did with Arwen in the films – especially how they gave her the Flight to the Ford, that scene is so great!
Yes, it is. I had never read the books before going to see FotR and that scene was the first one that really made me go WOW.
I was surprised when I saw the movie that Arwen was in there more, but I wasn’t against it! I’ve really come to appreciate her as a character only recently. Good post!
She’s a beautiful soul and her arc makes me cry with happiness at the end when she gets to marry the love of her life.
I watched the movies before reading the books (I read FOTR after seeing FOTR in the theater, but made myself wait to read TTT until I’d seen TTT, etc.), and so I never had an issue with Arwen having “more” time (though I have come to wish that Haldir hadn’t gotten extra time — couldn’t Glorfindel have gotten some actual screen time?!?!?) — translating a story between mediums demands that changes be made because a story told on the page is conveyed differently than one told on the screen (or on stage, or as a radio drama) and… I understand that and am generally cool with it.
Besides, I love how Arwen gives us a realistic example of an adult child striving to honor and obey her father, but also make her own decisions and move forward as her own person. That was something I was facing myself when these films came out, and the older I get, the more that dynamic interests me. Arwen does not outright defy her father, but seeks to help him understand, and he eventually does change his mind and gives her his permission and blessing to do what is best for her instead of stubbornly insisting on having his own way. As an adult child, and now as a parent myself, I see a lot of beauty in the film’s handling of this.
You had the patience to wait? Aww. Not me. I read all three books (in a giant LotR volume that I believe I still own) and then waited impatiently for the second film.
Yes. Arwen’s relationship with her father is special, and I’m so glad they didn’t go the usual route of “rebellious child who does whatever she wants, even if it’s hurtful to her disappointed parent” route. I love them both, and I understood Elrond’s point of view quite well — no father wants his daughter to give up her eternity for anything less than a King of Gondor!
Thank you for this! Film Arwen has always captured my imagination and my admiration, so picture my distress upon learning that there were many who scorned her. I’ve even heard people go so far as to say that the film adaptations “emasculate” Aragorn, due in part to the presence of Arwen. *cue HEAVY eye-rolling*
All that’s to say, I agree with you. I think it was necessary to expand Arwen’s story and feature her heavily in the films.
Pfft. Aragorn is still an amazing bad-ass, with or without Arwen having an expanded role. He is still the sworn protector of Frodo for as long as Frodo allows it, and later, leads them on a quest to find the kidnapped Merry and Pippin. There’s nothing “emasculated” about him. That’s just hissy fit reasoning. LOL
Yay, more Arwen fans!
Wonderful post! I also saw the first movie in theaters before I read the book (I was like 8 or something). I always thought she was so beautiful, and I love her and Aragorn’s storyline in the movie. A lot of that, I believe ( I may have forgotten partly), ended up in a story in the appendices to The Lord of the Rings books. I love the symbolism that you pointed out, how they are good example of marriage and how each spouse helps to make the other stronger.
Thank you! Arwen has some of my favorite scenes in the film (calling down the waters to wash away the Nazgul, the dream-memories she shares with Aragorn, reaching out to awaken him after he’s fallen in the river, her scenes with her father, etc).
Yes, if I remember right, Tolkien did mention some of this stuff in the Appendices — and so PJ rightfully took it and used it. They also did that in The Hobbit, with expanding Gandalf’s role in the films, which I much appreciated.
Your welcome! She did have some great scenes. Yes, I quite agree about the Hobbit too. Actually, according to my brother (who has read LotR much more recently than me) and the best of my memory, a lot of the extra stuff from the Hobbit was from the Lord of the Rings (not the appendices). Tauriel obviously was not, but I rather liked her story line. I know some people didn’t like all the added stuff in the Hobbit, and they probably could have cut back on some of the war scenes, but I liked it. I felt that despite the changes, they kept true to the important things. One of them being the things Thorin said as he was dying about how valuing hearth and home and other similar things over gold and jewels would make the world a better place.
Some people are cranky about The Hobbit, and that’s allowed, but around here, I 100% Love The Hobbit. 😉
Me too. 🙂
This was so good! I thought the scenes with Arwen and her father were wonderful and it really showed such a affectionate and soft side to Elrond.
I agree with you about Eowyn too. While she is a great character and fits into the modern day male/female equality narrative, that doesn’t mean that she is better than Arwen or more fitting for Aragorn. Tolkien could take female characters and make them all diverse. Eowyn is a soldier, Arwen is a noblewomen, but they both have similar strengths and weaknesses that everyone (not just women) can understand.
Thank you! Yes. Elrond can come across as a bit stern … until you see his dynamics with his daughter and how much he loves her and wants what is best for her (and for himself… he doesn’t want to lose her).
Eowyn and Arwen are both magnificent in their own ways, and I’m so pleased the film trilogy allows both of them to shine.
*pelts Tolkien with popcorn* give us more female characters, yo
At least, that’s the reaction I personally have when I try to read his books. 😉 I was very pleased to see Arwen’s important role in the movies, even when I had to stop watching them for other reasons.
A book doesn’t always need a female character, but I usually appreciate her when she shows up. 🙂
Very fair. 😉 I almost always prefer books/movies which do have plenty of female characters, although there are some exceptions which I enjoy despite the lack thereof. So I’m certainly never one to get mad when a woman is given an expanded role in an adaptation, lol.