An Edwardian Affair

downton abbey

Costume dramas fall into two categories: those true to the time period in which they are set, and those with clearly modern influences. You can tell the difference between something Charles Dickens wrote, for example, and something written by a modern author in a historical setting, because the worldview behind the material of Dickens is set in current events, whereas a modern author looks back on different periods through the aftermath. Hindsight gives wisdom, after all, and one trap modern writers often fall into is to have their characters speak, act, and think with a modern mindset rather than an authentic voice of the period.

Productions set in the Edwardian era are no exception. The most famous of all of these, Downton Abbey, does a credible job in some instances of keeping its characters true to the early nineteen hundreds (the family is scandalized when Mary’s lover winds up dead in her room) but not in others (when everyone accepts Thomas’ homosexuality without batting an eyelash, and are utterly tolerant of his lifestyle). Unfortunately, as wonderful as Edwardian productions can be, most are beset with modern ideals imposed on an earlier time period, or what is known in the historical community as “present-ism.”

Let’s begin with Titanic: Blood & Steel.

titanic blood and steel

In spite of its flawed morality, it is a well-written, character-driven study of human nature, hubris, and history, and it paints a vivid Edwardian world full of colorful, rich historical figures… that aren’t always true to 1912. (Indeed, its inclusion of famous suffragettes, a young Winston Churchill, and the labor unionist movement alone make it worthwhile.) Yet, it is also written from a decidedly modern viewpoint, from its approach to the politics of the period to the behavior of its lovers. Its flawed “hero,” Marc Muir, is modern in all his facets: he’s a working middle-class man having arisen from impoverished upbringings with concern for the labor force, who isn’t afraid to confront and judge his employer for what he sees as any possible “selfish or cutting-corners” behavior. He is utterly unaware of and disregards social classes, is unapologetic about previous immorality, and trusts the women in his love life to look out for their own reputations.

In reality, a man such as Marc would not exist as we find him on screen nor would any number of other characters throughout – in a Catholic Italian corner of Belfast it’s unlikely you’d find two women of such “modern” sensibilities (including a disregard for their reputation and for the morals of the period) that one winds up pregnant out of wedlock and the other conducts a not-so-discreet love affair with her superior at Harland & Wolff.

It’s a common trap of modern authors to impose “foresight” on their characters, in an attempt to make them understandable to us, and to prove them superior to their “backward-thinking” historical peers. You’ll find this in the patriot who believes in future American ideals, in the suffragist who has leanings of racial equality, in the shipbuilder who worries about the impact icy water has on steel. Edwardian men should have Edwardian beliefs and if not, then they should be within the belief system of the more radical thinkers of the period. Why not have your hero flawed in that sense? Why not make him of the same beliefs as all others, until they are challenged? Why not have an unshakable faith in the unsinkable Titanic? There was no reason to have any concerns about her, since neither the building process nor the tests raised any concern.

titanic

James Cameron’s film is modernism at its finest: most of the secondary and historical figures adhere to Edwardian ideals, but his heroine and hero exist to point out to the audience the fallacy, old-fashioned ignorance of such beliefs. Everything about them, from their carefree desire to live a Bohemian lifestyle to their casual approach to sex, is modern. Rose is totally out of period. She reads “better” books than the men in her life (where they are stuck on business, she is reading Freud), she has better taste in art, she is more open-minded, she wants to throw off the “shackles” of her social upbringing, and she is more sexually liberated. Like Marc Muir, instead of crafting his character as a true Edwardian, Cameron simply pushed a modern teenager into 1912.

Great writers discover a balance between past and present, between writing an authentic story to the period and having it accessible enough to modern audiences. They take their approach not from other modern ideals but source material: authors who lived and wrote in that time period. Dickens wrote authentic Victorian England, with all its rigidity and injustices, because he lived it. His heroines are believable, his heroes flawed but likable. Leo Tolstoy does the same for War & Peace: he lived later than the period, but all his many characters are wholly authentic to the time, because he imposes no modern foresight on them.

Placing modern characters into period pieces is becoming more and more common. It doesn’t fully derail what are in many ways wonderful stories, but it is important to notice a modern approach, and not assume the details (such as a lack of religious influence, or casual sexual affairs) are true to life in the Edwardian Era.

9 Replies to “An Edwardian Affair”

  1. This is what irritates me about a lot of ‘modern’ historic fiction. The main characters have that modern flavor that makes them wholly unrealistic for the era. If someone writes historic fiction they need to do their research. Anything less just doesn’t cut it. Poor Rose. She could have been so much better!

    1. It is indeed a problem in literature — modern heroines (and sometimes heroes) popping up in the midst of historical settings. Sadly, anyone who has never read classic literature, doesn’t pay attention, or is unaware of the time period won’t even notice — yet to some, it’s blatantly obvious and disappointing. I’m always delighted to find a modern author capable of working in the midst of a former time period and getting it right.

      Rose could have been more like Sybil Crawley and she would be much more likable — a modern woman for the Edwardian era, as opposed to a modern woman from OUR era.

  2. Yes, this bothers me to no end, too. It’s not that hard to write characters who are true to the time period they’re in. And if you want to to have a certain belief or act a certain way, explain what happens to change them.

    1. Exactly.

      Sometimes screenwriters do this really well — Charlotte in The Patriot and Cora in The Last of the Mohicans are good examples of strong, driven female characters that are wholly within their time period (neither is too modern, both act according to the era’s principles and beliefs). But much of the time, characters written for period films (and often books, too, sadly) aren’t at all true to the period.

  3. Wonderfully written, Charity – and an excellent subject also. It is true that modern character’s are interested into period pieces where they shouldn’t be however sometimes it can add some otherwise absent “spark and spunk.” 😉

    1. A good enough writer can add sizzle and spark while working within the era in which their story is set; the need to add modern ideals and characters simply reveals a writer’s lack of knowledge.

  4. One of my biggest pet peeves! Wonderful post…it expressed my issues with these kinds of characters so well. The worst is when you see adaptations of classic works that had “real” characters with true-to-time period mindsets and they rewrite them to change those mindsets to something more “real”. Ugh.

    1. I hate that. It irritates me more than anything else when an author’s original vision and characters are altered to suit present mindsets. (I could hardly get through the most recent adaptation of Oliver Twist — a haunted Bill? a black Nancy? No, just… no.)

Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s